Welcome~AMT Advanced Metal Material Technologies ( Shanghai ) Company Limited
Location:index>FAQ

FAQ

What are the Differences in Cost and Efficiency between Die Casting and MIM?

Date:2025-07-23   Views:1021

Both die casting and MIM deliver high-quality products, yet they differ significantly in cost-effectiveness and production efficiency. These distinctions are inherently batch-size-dependent, making each process uniquely suited for specific component types.

Process

Die Casting:

压铸件.jpg

Uses high pressure to force molten metal into a mold cavity for shaping.

MIM (Metal Injection Molding):

MIM成品.jpg

Mixes metal powder with a binder to form feedstock, which is injection-molded into a "green part." The part is then debound and sintered to achieve final density.

 

Cost Comparison

Aspect

Die Casting

MIM

Materials

Molten metal + lubricants

Fine metal powder + polymer binders

Mold

Made of high-pressure/high-temperature resistant materials.

Requires vacuum sealing systems.

Standard tool steel (e.g., P20) suffices.

Post-Processing

- High dimensional accuracy & surface finish
- Minimal machining needed
- Limitation: Prone to porosity due to turbulent metal flow; parts cannot be heat-treated or welded

- High dimensional precision, density, and surface finish
- Enables single-piece complex geometries, eliminating assembly needs


Efficiency Comparison

Aspect

Die Casting

MIM

Output Speed

High-speed production, easily automated.
E.g., JⅢ3 cold-chamber machines: 600–700 shots/8-hour shift; 

Hot-chamber machines: 3,000–7,000 shots/8-hour shift.

Single production line (injection + sintering): 200k–500k parts/month (for 10g-class parts).

Complexity

Limited for parts with deep concavities or intricate internal features.

Extremely high design freedom (thin walls, undercuts, internal features).

Material Range

Restricted to high-fluidity metals (e.g., Zn, Al, Mg); 

Limited strength/corrosion resistance.

Broad material compatibility (stainless steel, titanium, tungsten, etc.).


Suitable Applications

Process

Optimal Batch Size

Ideal Part Types

Die Casting

High-volume (>100k units)

- High-fluidity metal parts (e.g., housings, brackets)
- Non-structural components
- Parts requiring minimal post-processing

MIM

Medium-volume (10k–100k units)

- Small, complex geometries (gears, medical tools)
- High-precision/stainless steel parts
- Components needing high density & net-shape accuracy


Key Technical Notes:

  • Economic Scale: MIM tooling costs are lower, but sintering adds time; die casting achieves lower per-unit costs at massive scales.

  • Porosity in Die Casting: Turbulent flow during injection traps air, causing voids that prevent welding/heat treatment.

  • MIM Material Flexibility: Accommodates refractory metals (e.g., tungsten) and alloys impossible to die cast.



Leave your email for more ebooks and prices📫 !



About Us

Contact us

Contact:Fidel

Tel:021-5512-8901

Mobile:19916725893

Email:sales7@atmsh.com

Address:No.398 Guiyang Road Yangpu China

Tags PowderInjectionMolding PIMDesignProcess PIMTechnology MaterialProperties MaterialSelection IndustrialManufacturing Powder Injection Molding PIM Technology